R-Rated Movies: It’s Time to Lower the Age Limit
October 31, 2016
Have you ever been in a situation where you wanted to see an R-rated movie, but you were too young to buy the ticket on your own? How did you go about getting into the theater? Did you pick another movie? Have a parent come with you? Maybe you even resorted to sneaking in.
Teenagers aren’t allowed into an R-rated movie unless they are seventeen years old and have their ID with them. While there may be some logic as to this age requirement, the truth is, the age limit for R-rated movies should be lowered. In today’s society, teens are already exposed to R-rated content. A Pew Internet Survey reported that 95% of U.S. young adults between the ages of 12 through 17 are online and, of whom, 80% have seen that type of content on their timeline at different points in their lives. Parents and adults feel like teenagers aren’t mature enough to see violent or sexual content, but teenagers aren’t surprised by the content at all.
By law teenagers can get their license at the age of sixteen. If we trust sixteen-year- olds behind the wheel of a car, they should be trusted to go into a theater and watch an R-rated movie. Also, theaters are already – in a way – classifying kids as young as eleven as adults, as this is the common age when people cease to pay the “child” price for a ticket and move into the more expensive “adult” option. So maybe eleven – fifteen is too young for a R-rated movie, but If a sixteen-year-old is being charged as an adult, she/he should have that decision on what movie ticket she/he wants to buy.
Whether parents give their child permission to see an R-rated film or not, children will end up finding a way to see the R-rated film. According to a Federal Trade Commision (FTC) undercover survey of 295 theaters, 46% of teenagers between the ages of 13-16 watch R-rated movies without their parents. Oftentimes, they resort to sneaking into the movie or asking a stranger to buy the ticket for them. In a 2014 survey conducted by the National Institutes of Health, 6,522 teens were asked if they had seen a rated-R movie in the past few years. Researchers chose 40 R-rated movies with the most extreme examples of graphic violence. On average, 12.5 % had seen each movie.
A child’s maturity level should be the determining factor and not the age. If a child under seventeen can handle content that a seventeen-year-old can handle, then that child should be able to watch an R-rated movie. To provide a solution to both sides, the age limit should be lowered to at least sixteen. At that age, teens are learning to become more independent and mature. They also have already been exposed to that type of content, so prohibiting them will only cause problems that the teens, their parents, and the theaters don’t need.
Mason • Apr 13, 2021 at 6:29 AM
Thanks, very useful for my argumentative essay.
All the way from
– Wiesbaden Germany
Samuel Diener • May 23, 2020 at 1:48 AM
There doing so great with allowing anyone to watch PG-13 rated movies. They need to have that for R rated movies at least if your 10 or older. And same should apply to NC-17 movies. It can say no children 17 and under admitted but that doesn’t mean they have to enforce the guidelines. Age requirements for movies no matter what they are rated is discrimination. Never trust anyone who can’t handle an R rated or even NC-17 alone to drive a car. Driving a car does need an age requirement. Movies, definitely not. No one would ever find the NC-17 rating offensive if movie theatre’s would never ever enforce the guidelines. If you own a movie theatre, never turn guidelines into rules.
JOHN JEFRIQUEZ • Oct 30, 2019 at 1:38 PM
This helps in my class’s debate. my students are using this article as an excellent source in this debate. Thank you for this. I also believe that it should be lowered to a mid-teens age of 15.
matt • Oct 6, 2019 at 10:20 PM
my thought is that when children go into the DOT to get their drivers licenses parents could sing a wavier saying they are alright with their child going to rated R movies by themselves, if they would like to have a parent with them, or if they would just rather them not be admitted at all. This would be better because then the parents could monitor what they think their teen is ready for or not ready for. Also, while the age should be lowered, it shouldn’t go too low so a kids first drivers license would be a pretty good time in my mind.
Bleh • May 28, 2019 at 7:08 PM
You’re a REAL life saver. My team and I were desperately looking for if not five, just ONE Con “Should Kids be Able to Watch Rated R Movies” website. And then I stumbled across this. Not only good details, but awesome supporting facts! Even though the debate has not begun, it’s safe to say we’ve won!
william • May 21, 2019 at 2:42 PM
i think the age limit should definitely go down to at least 13 or 14
nobody special thats all! • Feb 26, 2019 at 11:25 AM
I think that the age should be under 13.
someone • Nov 24, 2017 at 8:07 AM
It was little useful for debate. Thank you:)
-from Seoul, Korea
ju • Nov 21, 2017 at 7:21 AM
I have different thought with this
Shane Turner • Nov 18, 2017 at 3:34 AM
R should be under 16 requires an accompanying parent or adult guardian as it used to be. NC-17 should have stayed as no children under 17 admitted. I am 37 and the age needs to be changed on these two ratings back to what they used to be .